Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for About space…
Last night I saw a brilliant example of use of space in art at a “concert” by first and second graders. Their art work was projected above the performers and one piece was about the child and her pet. The sky was a thin blue strip at the top and a thin green strip at the bottom. The child and her dog or cat drawing was small figures on the green strip at the far left. 7/8th of the piece was blank. I thought it was brilliant.
Oh look- naked women painted by a man! How original. Where oh where are the naked men painted by women- or for that matter- men. I think what’s most interesting here is Matisse’s painting the decoration of his time- so to speak- all the Victorian backgrounds. And thank god for our more modern aesthete where this kind of decoration isn’t forced on everybody. I use pattern-on-pattern-on-pattern in my work. My backgrounds are grey and tan and clean and simple.
My late father would have loved to have known that there was a name for my mother’s obsessive desire to hang something on every blank wall and fill every shelf with “decoratives”.
Matisse, at his best, and he was not always, worked out the spaces around to interact with his subjects. What he lacked in the ability to paint, he made up for in decorative design. Many artists since have done it better.
Space gives the eyes a transition from object to object to appreciate what is unfolding. An artist who knows how to coordinate the use of colors and where to apply them and give emphasis on the main focus makes the work more pleasing .The eyes can easily move to the other parts of the painting and appreciate the relationship of one part to the other.
There may have been a “horror vacui” in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, but more recently art has served to be a place of rest, contemplation and sanctuary in an otherwise frantic world. Perhaps the overpopulated Asians have always known about this. Also, the idea of getting “more for your money” in art may be a western concept.
I found the examples of Matisse in the click-back to be visually cluttered with no space! Very hard on the eye.
My paintings are all about technique and space and fun in my “What if I were to.do what??”……..series. It’s also about color composition, and some of addition of design motifs in gold as frames.
I enjoy reading your stories, advice, tips and the thoughts you share with complete strangers. Reading your letters is like being in your studio. I feel like I’m taking classes. I often look at your paintings posted on the Internet and absorb tremendous beauty of the landscapes in BC, the manifestation of mountains and the spectrum of colours depending on the time of a day or year you capture with perfection. I visited BC only once, still the beauty of it is in my heart and I see all of it in your paintings.” Mississauga Ontario, Canada
Space is grace, but add too much of it and it implies laziness on the part of the artist.
Matisse is not a good example of judicious use of space. The emperor is not wearing any clothes and I see it. He is using patterns in every square inch of space available. When I think of space I think of “empty” space as opposed to “filled” space. Matisse has an unusual idea of “the empty space around the figures” sic. . Matisse not only fills his canvases with images he reinforces it with an overabundance or color. Space to me is a lack of invention or intrusion by the artist. Air, a place to breath; an absence of artistic intervention. Emptiness can also refer to a calming color in a sea of brilliance.
Bruce, I once took my portfolio, full of naked men paintings (I am a woman) to a workshop for a crit. It caused a dead silence and a very awkward pause, and the instructor turned it into a joke. In this part of the world women painting naked men are not very popular in the mainstream. It’s a niche that I decided not to pursue although I loved painting them.
This site is a hoot! Not just for the valuable info but for the wonderful characters that inhabit it.
The reason why male nudes cause such a controversy is clear, but I’ve never heard it voiced. A male has genitals on view where as female genitals are mostly hidden. If all of a sudden female nudes were painted with genitals on view there would be an almighty outcry!
Many years ago I went to a lecture on The Zen of Painting. The lecturer emphasized the importance of creating a ritual in the studio. She said that a painter should use this ritual in order to get into ‘the zone’. Ever since, I have tried to adopt this method of work in the studio. Unfortunately, since I am a very disorganized person, I have never succeeded in making it into a routine. I haven’t given up hope yet! Barbara
I agree that the Matisse paintings shown seem to be ‘busy’ with patterning, but the point is he created room for his colours by his use of space on the canvas, as opposed to creating the illusion of space in the mind’s eye. He wasn’t really interested in creating 3D illusional paintings. And if other people do it better nowadays (who?), he got there first! Space. The final front ear.
The oil painting–Warm Autumn–wow! The painting makes me feel like I can walk up to the house and smell the warmth of the trees as I go.
I think that Matisse can neither be understood or appreciated through literal or concrete thought processes. He was after the portrayal of an approximation of a feeling. I like the suggestion that his work could be seen as relating to Victorian culture…whether in reaction or celebration! Some of his imagery is deeply biomorphic…his large tropical leaves reflect the shape of the hippocampus…just sayin’.
Slight correction: I should have said…his large tropical leaves reflect the shape of a traumatized hippocampus. I was once struck by that when I saw the brain scans of those distortions in a text book.
To Anon -re: Nude men. I agree that nude men were are not a topic for interpretation in painting for the reasons stated. But I’ve found out several things about painting nude men. Even when clothed, I still had trouble getting them sold. In the twentieth century, women prevail as the archetype sex symbol. Back when the Greeks ruled the world, and through the Renaissance, men were the archetype. But then sex was more –bisexual and practiced by many. Now that same sex partners are becoming more accepted, I have managed to sell quite a few nude men and continue to get commissions for nude men. So, all is not lost. Remember, what goes around comes around. Keep painting nude men, they are a worthy subject for all artists.
Well- I got a good laugh today! Thanks- anon- and Rick- too- Gay men who are artists have often been pigeonholed into thinking about and making ‘gay’ art- read: sexually oriented- because nobody’d EVER done it before- in the last several hundred years. And go ahead and try to find it out there- when male/male greek or roman vessels or mosaics or frescoes or whatever are found- they are mostly hush-hushed into oblivion. But the amount of heterosexism embedded in naked women paintings is blatent- and boring- at best- because it’s all based in bullsh*t. As an abstract artist who’s not a heterosexual- people have always wondered why my art wasn’t gay enough! Oh well.
BTW the femaile nude body is MUCH easier to render than a male one because of all the obvious curves and bold shapes. Male anathomy, especailly in a relaxed state, is very subtle – so it’s difficult to get it convicingly and to make the poses interesting and inviting to look at. It’s a great challenge for an artist.
Derby Tidal Pond 1 acrylic painting, 34 x 43 inches by Jack Dickerson, Brewster, MA, USA |
Love it … room to think ! …and combines the Brit’s love of Tea with their tendency to emotionally isolate themselves ! Wow