The concern of women-mothers mixed media by Monique Jarry, Montreal, QB, Canada |
Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for The fine art of exploration…
Dear Robert, Comparing Tchaikovsky to an artist is like comparing apples to Astronaughts. When I go to the symphony, I haven’t got a clue what I am listening to. I am afraid my approach to art is the same. I am always asking what an artist is trying to communicate to me. I am in awww at the combination of notes at a symphony and I am speechless over brushstrokes of an artist I love and admire. While I use to loath Leonard Cohn and found his voice cryptic and haunting, I have really grown a great appreciation for his melodic songs and when kd Lang sings his songs it is heart stopping. Sadly, the “Brand” I see with most artists is usually dictated by galleries. I have always said that galleries are a business and a stepping stone between the artist and the buyer. If you have a collector for your work, then more power to you. But what I see and hear from other artists when their work makes an inevitable change, is the gallery starts telling the artist what will sell and what they should paint. This is when an artist needs to pack up their stuff and move on to another gallery. We all need to eat and it is really no big deal to start filling the needs and mouths of everyone involved. I think this is a colossal mistake and leads to a series of mediocre work where nobody is happy, except for the collector who keeps their wallet close and closed. Thats just my experience… John Ferrie
It is rewarding for us, to hear people say….”I can recognize your works by your style – anywhere”. This is the applause which we as painters, hear. Style is the song we repeat again and again. The question is does our need for this applause, imprison our spirits and confine our expression. I fear that many of us lack the inventive, restless spirit of an Emily Carr who painted as if on a quest to capture the essence of what she saw. We paint in the comfort zone, which gives us joy. Many of us are not ‘soul tortured artists’ seeking the undefinable. We paint in our personal zone of joy and the applause of those who like our style validates us.
Hear, hear, Fredericks!!!
After painting for a number of years in the same medium one can become stale. Stale in the sense of doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results. Artists have a certain “signature” for any work they do. That is why we can recognize an artist from a distance. An artist can make some attempt to change their signature but unfortunately most can’t. With that said, Picasso comes to mind. He was able to break away from his early representational works to his later “signature” cubist work. The change worked for him. One wonders where Van Gogh’s work would have taken him if he had lived another 30 years or so.
I do think the majority of galleries want artist to have a certain look as well as certain subject matter. I made the decision to paint only in oils and with the palette knife but put no limit on subject matter. I paint abstracts and abstract figures as well as landscapes and I think my style comes through in all of my work. I’ve been blessed to be in galleries that support my versatility and I also have clients that love my work, however, I have had trouble getting into galleries outside of my state and I think it is because of my wide range of subject matter. I’ve considered narrowing my subject matter but find I just need to go with what inspires me a the moment. If I painted just one way all the time I’d be totally bored.
Thank You Robert for bringing the fine spin to my present state of “career” as an Artist. In these troubled times of slow selling I have doubted my stubborn streak of independence. I have known for years that I could improve sales by doing what my clients like but resist and only do it when they give me a deposit. Now I know the freedom I would lose from getting the recognition I have thought was my end goal…and the good fortune that is mine to not be a recognized Artist but just a provincial or regional Artist. I can still paint as I wish because my bills match my spotty income and with success would come the manacles of bigger bills making me paint as others wished. Thank you for more air under my wings. You always come through. charlespeck.com
It’s a matter of development. If you’re a one trick pony, albeit a good one, eventually your market is going to get saturated and you’re going to be sitting there with dozens of Chinese-junks-in-the-sunset paintings that are going nowhere. But to suddenly switch to Jackson Pollack action paintings is going to confuse the heck out of your audience. I think artists should always be in the process of taking their art to the next step, whatever that may be but not necessarily leaping from one style to another. If you look at a retrospective of great innovative artists, quite often you will see that where they are now is not where they started out from and with any luck you will see in their work, how they arrived at their current style. To my mind, gradual development keeps your audience from getting bored with the same old, same old, without scaring the beegeebers out of them by suddenly doing a 90 degree on them.
I am SO GRATEFUL for your sense of humour! And even if I don’t respond to all of your letters, believe me, the laughter, thoughts and tears have hit home. How wonderful that you manage to seek out these fleeting yet timeless thoughts. How brilliant that you share. stenjeve@earthlink.net
Did you think to ask the one way boat picture collector how often he needs EXLAX? It sounds like a good case of Freudian anal retentiveness. Prague
Two things I have learned in my travels in this life, one from an instructor who took two weeks “off” every few months to paint just what she wanted and not what the collectors demanded. Another was in an recent article in International Artist but I can’t locate it right now. To paraphrase the writer, a painter of some experience: paint some for sale, some for practice and some for yourself. A good balance, I think.
Most of us seem to remain in a certain style groove once we have found where we were going. What keeps me going is the themes I revisit over the years: environment, animals, childhood, and the mutual dependency between man and animal, which tend to be more in the realm of portraits. Humor is also infused into these paintings. I like to make people grin. This has developed out of quite the opposite when in the late 70’s, I observed at a SECCA exhibit an old lady staring in shock at one of my more feminist lithos concerning the different ages of womanhood
Being a musician and songwriter what I see most commonly is what you describe. People become charicatures of themselves. U2 is a great example, after exploring stranger areas in the 90s with Brian Eno and Electronica, they complained of poor sales. So they went back to the tried and true, and sure enough they’re raking in the cash again. What works works. But is art about exploring the edges of experience? Furthering the boundaries of reality? Challenging consensus? Or is it about putting food on the table?
I have often said my works look like they were done my more than one person, and sometimes by a man, and I have wondered whether I should work to make them recognizable as done by me ( as yours certainly are). Also, I just read an article about Quang Ho in Southwest Art magazine where he said his work shown at Gallery 1261 in Denver was eclectic, it looked like the work of ten different artists. So, these two messages reinforce my idea to keep experimenting and let it flow naturally.
Congratulations Robert, on your higgledy-piggledy boats! Most artist should be flattered, to be different, flamboyant – well Artists! As trite as it may come across, I do paint for myself, that is what gives me the greatest comfort of all. Sure it’s gratifying to sell once in awhile, but I have plenty sitting around that I just happen to just enjoy. Exploration is true creativity, it’s how we grow as artists.
After 15 years of painting, and being represented in several galleries, I can’t stop exploring. The subject speaks to me, the paint answers, and off I go into a different interpretation. I am fortunate in that my galleries seem to understand this aspect of who I am. Rather than, “that’s a Cheryl O” it’s “what’s Cheryl O doing now”? I know the hazards of this, but can not help it anymore than I can help having brown eyes.
Many artists are easily “branded” because they are what I call “one note painters”. They find a subject/motif and pretty much beat it to death and never “explore”. What places an artist’s work under one umbrella is not so much what they paint, but how they paint it. The voice will always be heard, even if the song is very different.
I have been smiling all day as I review some 4-5 months of e-mails…..and 60% of them are your letters I saved. Today’s letter really made me smile when you commented that the collector preferred his boats to be facing all the same direction. The beauty IS in the eye of the beholder as the saying goes. Thank goodness we can enjoy our personal collection of forays into the forest of our painting pleasures. Open wallets don’t necessarily bring soulful rewards! Columbia Falls, MT
I was striving for a certain signature style…It isn’t going to happen…Nope…It does not look like it….And after reading your letter I am just going to keep puddling along…although quite happily now as I won’t be striving for a certain style of my own…My style seems to be all over the map.
I just wanted to comment on your latest book. I have been reading it in bed at night for the past two weeks. Apart from the fact that it puts me nicely to sleep with good thoughts and quiet amusement, it makes my day in the morning seem so worthwhile. Thank you, Robert for the best art motivation and feeling of creative joy I have ever had.
As a artist I find that I am always on the lookout toward transforming my style into something a little more exciting by using a similar format but perhaps changing my strokes. This does take me out of my confort zone, but none the less, I’m constantly trying to break out from that cursed comfly zone I know so well which is one big yawn. I want those who follow and appreciate my art to be transitioned gently into the new phases my art goes through as it evolves. To stay in one place is artistic suicide.
One of several possible ways around this dilemma is work in two different NAMES. Different name, different style. Remember though, never give one gallery A the B stuff “A” work goes to the gallery carrying the “A” stuff, and give “B” stuff to the gallery that carries the “B” stuff. Keep your stuff eclectic and not subject specific. The last worse resort is never be famous enough that anyone cares. Fame is surely a double edged sword. In the end just becoming famous is tough enough so cross that bridge when you come to it.
One thing I learned a few days ago…don’t keep your old, substandard, sentimental value “early works” on your walls. You never know who may show up in your house when you least expect!
On Fame. I have just been to a series of very lovely meditation classes where I was reintroduced to two two words to consider: permanence and impermanence. Interesting words to look up when considering where fame sits between the spaces in our lives. Worth looking at. Enjoy. Leigh
i track the world through my ear sometimes it comes out through my eye
An artist’s style is like a road you travel. You may stay on that road for a while, this way to get to your destination, or you may turn off onto another road, another way and maybe a different destination. The problem is when you don’t like where you are going or where you are now. That’s a signal to look for another way.
I love landscape paintings, particularly when the painter has captured some of the essence of an outdoor experience. Sometimes it’s as if I can smell the water, or feel the wind on my face. I love painting landscapes as well. For me, this is all about uncovering what stands between my attempt at expression and those feelings of immediacy that draw me to the idiom. It’s better than capturing fireflies in a bottle. It’s discovering and calling to hand the means of telling another about the wonder of being alive in nature. Okay, so that sounds a bit pompous, and certainly cliched. I’ll excuse myself by saying that painting landscapes, particularly a plein air, is also great fun!
This is a wise letter and a stunning painting.