Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for Fluidity…
Another great point! Fluidity is a much better term than “looseness” when dealing with tightness; it connotes control, not haphazard sloppiness. When drawing, our best work is done while standing and working from our whole body, a little like fencing. The wrist, however, should remain supple, slightly flexible.
Robert, I know I enjoy your letters because I never skip a single one. “Fluidity” is the type of letter I most enjoy because it educates. Many of your letters deals with the inner environment, but I want to encourage you to write more letters that are concerned with the outer environment, from the body to the canvas. The inner world is subjective, important, and ultimately informs the outer world; however, to understand that fluid, thick strokes are an indication of professionalism gives me more of what I need to become a professional than sharing how we feel inside as we paint. Thanks a million for this last letter. I hope to read more like it in the future.
I prefer to see a bit more technique in my own work and am taking efforts to improve that. However, it seems that contemporary art is overly concerned with brush technique. The vigor and liveliness we see in Harley’s work, or any popular artist today, is absent from many Old Masters and historical paintings. We never see globs of paint, lines from brush strokes, or an irregular surface: only a smoothly varnished glass-like canvas or panel carefully free of such distractions. It makes me wonder how artists will change their technique if some other variation begins selling better. Smooth was the norm during several periods of art history and some aren’t “fluid” but purely sloppy … At some point we arrive at our personal identity of technique and have to paint our way, regardless what is selling.
On Robert Sesco’s comment: isn’t that just why we keep reading these newsletters? the different subjects, the understanding of how others experience the live of an artist, the philosophical as well as the practical techniques etc, everything is valuable!! please do stay versatile, Robert!
Marlien, I read them all, I only encouraged that which is instructional vs. subjective. If one aspect of ‘professionalism’ means thick, confident brushstrokes, we can all apply this. But to measure passion, or illustrate individual solitude, or express love in words, these are like reading poetry: beautiful and perhaps moving, but not something that I can turn on like a switch that will help me to improve. There is anxiety prior to actually swimming, and no amount of instruction on the beauty of a long, luxurious swim, or the admonishments of how to arrange your inner environment prior to going into water over your head, will help as much as instruction on how to kick and breathe and stroke. At any rate, Marlien, I doubt seriously that Robert adjusts his letters because of something I write. You have nothing to fear, and I AM quite versatile, only thirsty for what makes a professional.
Ah, there is only one Harley Brown… Apart from Harley, I find in what you have said with reference to fluidity a misleading mix of concepts, expressions and techniques squeezed into a word not meant to contain them all. It seems that if you were attempting to redefine or extend the meaning of fluidy you might well have, just as unabashedly and to avoid confusion, invented a word instead of taking such liberties.
This point of fluidity is so well taken. I explain the exact same concept to glass cutting….yet I fail to apply this with my own actions with paint. I think I am lacking the confidence still. I have been putting in hours and hours, as my husband is traveling lots and I am home alone. When I get to 2000 hours or 2000 paintings I will show you my novice efforts. I have seriously committed to the ten year plan/10,000 hours in paint which started at Hollyhock. Still trying to find my way….thank you for pushing me.
Fluidity sounds like free flowing strokes uninhibited and moving easily along the way. When met with obstacles, like rocks and boulders, the flowing river will bring forth some interruptions to break that continuous flow. What a wonderful concept to give a piece of work some sort of mystery for the viewer to inspect and discover. Perhaps this fluidity could come naturally or be developed. How do we know if we have it?
I like the idea of a long fluid stroke. Thanks for the tips.
I just wanted to take the time to thank you. Rick Taylor passed on your link to me and just as he said, I look forward to reading your teaches and thoughts bi-weekly. Ive taken to incorporating your lessons into whatever painting I am working on at the time. It is a fun exercise and always pushes me forward. Having no training or knowledge of my joy for painting until 2 years ago, I treasure your insightful thoughts and guidance. With 2 small children it is hard to commit to any out side education. You coming to my house twice a week is just perfect. Thank you, it means a great deal.
Fluidity is also a part of “activation” that part of a work of art that moves the eye around within the picture plane. Generally circular in nature, it is a line, often a dotted line, that moves back in on itself. One doesn’t know why people follow these lines, but they do. Perhaps it’s because we love mysterious curves.
Fluid elements are most often achieved by working from the human figure. The natural confluence of curves and shaped volumes in undraped models is the best training for fresh fluidity. Quick drawings do it best.
Water color technique helps plus lots of quick gestures from live models.
Harley Brown’s work is certainly very accomplished, but I did not see long flowing confident strokes of the brush, maybe, as with the old masters, you have to see the work in real life, and not online from a photo image. Confidence is what I think you are trying to tell us to express, Robert. As much as I like to bag art college, the very fact we had to work all of the time, often fast, and often on great big paper where all the goofy looking work showed up what we needed to work on, confidence and improvement in technique is what we got, and, yes, those long flowing brushstrokes would then emerge with doing and doing and doing!
Take a look at Harley Brown’s nude in the previous clickback, Daniela. Note the beautiful cool light on the neck and shoulder area which forms into a langourous line describing the form and adding elegance and a center of interest. Then look across the body to the warm light that proceeds wanderingly down the whole front of the body. It is these sinuous linear shapes that make the figure appealing. Imagine, for a minute, if they were blocked in and more intermittent — they would certainly make the girl less alluring and the painting less interesting.
It would be interesting to discover if John Newman’s stroke caused him to suffer a shift in colour perception also… his right-handed works appear positively dull next to those glorious, glowing left-handers.
I was definitely not knocking Harley Browns work, I love it , it is accomplished and beautiful and fluid. I was thinking more that Robert was talking about the fluidity of technique that comes with work and confidence, the work that comes when you no longer ‘drive with the brakes on’. And it shows.
The change in John Newman’s colour palette is interesting. Was that also post stroke? I practise using both hands for drawing just in case (I am getting old) I have a stroke. Left hand different but just as good. Carril Karr. New Zealand
Se Vende Tortillas watercolour painting, 11 x 14 inches by Donna Dickson, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico |
Wow, that is a stunningly beautiful painting!