Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for Notes on paucity…
Another nice “gift” Robert! Loved it!
Kathy Anderson’s painting included with today’s letter is a good example of paucity. Nice painting and who needs more? About the missing canoe: I’m a watercolor painter who sometimes uses acrylic on gessoed paper. I tell students and others that if they see an acrylic on gessoed paper done by me they can bet the farm on the fact that under the gesso is a crappy watercolor. Cover up may be the best thing.
And a further comment: I checked Martha Handby Savage’s work after reading her response and it looks really good to me. She says she uses too much detail, or words to that effect. I think not, Martha. There’s plenty of room for the viewer to add thought.
Now I know why I’m not fond of most landscapes. They give me too much info. I don’t have to climb into the picture and include myself somehow. I enjoy more paintings where I need to do some of my own work.
Robert, did you take a photo of the painting with the red canoe while the red canoe was still in it? I want to see what you are talking about.
What is interesting about your Twice-Weekly letters is that you pick up scarcely used words and put them in a concise attractive modern text! Men of letters should be grateful to you for that !
Paucity, what a great concept. As they say: ‘Less is More’. When painting my abstracts, I try to achieve ‘calm, simplicity and beauty’. Sometimes I doubt myself, and think ‘is there enough there to make it interesting, or does it need more’. I know how easily I can overdo it and suddenly, it’s too much and the work loses its appeal. Thanks for a great new word for my art vocabulary.
“The secret of being a bore is to tell everything” is my new motto. Your letter was timely: I’ve been contemplating putting some features on this painting of a girl. Now I won’t. We all know what’s in that shadowy face and more detail would be both irrelevant and distracting. It would take away from my initial goal of showing light on water and the human form. Thanks for reminding me that enough is enough.
I just had to take out a couple of lotus’ from my lotus pond. It was flooded with beautiful pink lotus. Too many. Paucity was just the word I needed to see it.
As I am aging I believe this to be very true. But my story is I have an oil landscape bought yrs ago in Germany. My dad always told my kids to watch for the canoe- it was around the bend! They were fascinated using their imaginations.
I painted a lake scene with a yellow kayak on the banks. When my artist friend saw it, she said, that looks like a lemon, so I left it anyway, simply for the memory of that day by the lake. Everyone does have different opinions, another artist friend liked it. It was pastels, so I couldn’t easily remove it. I will think about your painting of the invisible red canoe now, and wonder if I should just redo mine. Anyway, interesting thoughts. But I have also learned that every person has a different view of what you paint. Of course I work as a full time accountant, and I am not a professional artist, but I love trying.
little, simple things~ make life rich in blooms and beauty~! …..
Reminded me of an art teacher who told me “It takes two people to paint a good picture. One to put the paint on the canvas. The other to knock him in head and tell him when to stop.”
Paucity defines watercolor. When painting wet on wet there is no going back, so you can go only to a certain place and add no more. The bold commitment of your comments on the paper. Nuance, subtley, hints and gesture of the brush allows the viewer to imagine Where truely less is more.
Thanks for the “note on Paucity” – its put into words something that I say constantly to my students: “don’t give it all to the viewer”!
Ahh yes. Paucity. In artwork, writing, and other creative endeavors: one only needs to observe the length of a good skirt on a woman to get it right: long enough to cover the subject yet short enough to be interesting. The contemplative scotch sounds like a fabulous way to zero in on this particular balance. Cheers!
I would have loved to see before and after pictures of your painting!
I am enjoying you letters. Thank you very much. Atlanta
These letters are incredibly informative and, curiously enough, there is always a twinge of humour which keeps me coming back for more. Some, like this one, made me laugh out loud.
Loved the article on paucity. I must say leaving one eye out can also be a clever way of solving the problem of aligning and matching both eyes! I suppose with a caricature it is not as important as it is with a portrait, animal or human! Thanks as always for your intuitive wisdom!
I liked this letter about leaving things out. Just don’t leave out the chocolate when making chocolate cake.
One of my favorite letters yet, Robert. “Less is more” is painful but true. I tend naturally toward “maximalism” and while I can’t force myself to do less on the canvas to begin with (I wish I could get the knack of that one), I do find myself painting out distracting business more often now, with satisfying results. Erasing hours of effort hurts, but it works. Thanks for this reminder.
By the By Robert, the painting of yours that is over the bed in our downstairs bedroom, entitled Alta Lake just happens to have a red canoe turned over on the dock!!!! So there Joe Blodgett whoever you are. And my brother John, an Industrial Designer, often will wait for a person whos wearing red to appear before hell take a picture.
Jenkins is fantastic! There is a careful, intelligent rendering of line that is well thought out and always simplified. Probably over an explorative pencil drawing. As you have stated elsewhere before Robert, a great deal can be learned from the caricaturist’s art.
My first visit to your “letters”; directed here by a fellow artist. Wonderful subject. My mentor, a wet-into wet watercolorist, used to caution us: “Stop putting the eyelashes on the seagulls!” Your timing for me is terrific, as the next painting in my pile was starting to get a little too complicated. Thanks for the new word for my vocabulary.
Thank you for giving us a word for the idea of leaving a little something for the viewers imagination. I consider my husband, David Lussier, a master at this. I myself still have to remember to not tell everything. Recently we were looking over one of his seascapes and I said to him ” That would be great except for the white buoy, it distracts from the subject.” Of course, when I turned over and looked at the back ,he had named it , “White Buoy”.
“Notes on Paucity” hit home! Thanks! I wish I’d learned this lesson before writing and illustrating my kids’ book. Someone once described an internet message I’d written as an ‘adjectival assault’; I’ve never met an adjective I didn’t like.:) Using watercolours with coloured pencil for loose lines on Fabriano paper, I try to hold myself back from overdoing the detail. Viewers can then use their imagination.
Thank you for the definition of Principle of Paucity. I very much enjoy your essays. I was a graphic designer and became a painter and have taught for the last ten years. Teaching is my passion. My students are adults, mostly women, most over sixty, all delightful. I encourage them to sign up for your letters. I read the ones in class that are especially pertinent. Doing so reinforces what I teach. I give my students homework: painting assignments, sculptural assignments and writing assignments. The following is a writing assignment. I thought your readers might find it interesting. I expected ten or so combined examples. I was surprised at the response. What Katharina might say Homework One of you said, Oh, in my head I can hear Katharina telling me how to paint. Make a list of at least five things that I might be saying. Combined answers: Dont leave your brush in the water Bring the entire painting up at one time Squeeze out all the basic colors on your palette If you painted it once, you can paint it again Try painting a sliver of paper and try it out on the painting Dont save your favorite part of the painting Paint subjects you love Do sketches /thumbnails before starting a painting Start by blocking in major shapes Cover the whole canvas before making adjustments Work big! Use as big a brush as you can Use more paint Do not use canvas paper Do value studies before starting painting Plan what the background should be before starting to paint Will you learn more from finishing a painting or starting a new one? Dont go to details unless painting is working Have several paintings in progress at one time How much do you love this painting? Paint more efficiently. Put down the correct color the first time Make color charts Know when to stop painting and declare you are finished Make changes in the beginning Work on good surfaces, you are worth it Dont fuss with details Step back from the canvas Cover white of painting surface, dont let the specs show What is this painting about? Add a surprise spot of color Lay out your colors the same way every time Avoid adding white as long as possible Every time you use the brush you have an opportunity to make a correction Do not just color, think about it Paint the color and value you see, not what is convenient Use negative painting Use painterly strokes Every stroke affects the area around it Use a full range of values Blow up the photograph that you are using as a reference Use photo quality paper to print photographs Painting from life is always better The dark areas in photographs do not show what you saw Draw with a brush Use your entire arm to paint Paint standing up Place your paints on your dominant side Sometimes it is better to take paint off than to put more paint on Make a foam core holder to hold your smaller painting surfaces Relax and breath Think loose Think about what your subject feels like: water flowing, sun shining Use your palette knife to mix larger quantities of paint Use bold passionate strokes Add a spot of color at the edge to move the eye around the painting
I do think that less is often more, in writing for sure, and in art, and even in things like cooking. How many times, A and I have said how good something tastes in part due to its simplicity. I think the idea of keeping things simple is true in so many aspects of one’s life. As for the paucity in one’s work, I think it can be difficult to eliminate something you worked hard to create (a visual scene, or a written one). It can feel almost like a betrayal to your thoughts/ideas/hard work to remove something you thought necessary at one point. Still, I agree that removing elements can enhance one’s work – leave a bit of that mystery. There are moments, though, where a long, descriptive sentence is intoxicating and when read doesn’t feel cumbersome or boring, but beautiful. And there are times where a painting ripe with details leaves one’s visual senses spinning with sparks of inspiration that might have only been conjured up thanks to something as simple as a red canoe. I’ve written in both styles: straightforward storytelling and long, descriptive storytelling. Perhaps the key is balance. Which is often the key, isn’t it? To know when to cut something out, but to also have the courage to leave it, even if you’re the only one who understand why it’s important it remains.
Your letter reminded me that once I read something like–“To suggest is to create, to state is to destroy.” Do not remember the source and have not been able to find it but it probably was a comment on writing rather than creating art. However, the statement is relevant for both.
OMG. This really hit home. Having BEEN an engineer, I now see that I’ve got frequently (OK, consistently) too much detail. From now on I’ll watch viewers of my paintings at the gallery and see how fast they migrate to the wine and cheese, or not. Thanks for the letter.
red canoe—-great idea: titling the painting for something that isn’t in it. for something that used to be in it. for something that may someday be in it. This really allows the painting to “breathe”.
Your article on paucity reminded me of that quote by Coco Chanel: Before you leave the house, look in the mirror and remove one accessory. Presumably the same aesthetic idea applies to paintings. I’m generally fond of simpler compositions, but I find that my busier, detail-overloaded pieces sell well to families with young children. Maybe it’s the Waldo conditioning.
Unfortunately the result of my putting mystery into painting usually manifests in the inquiry, “Just what is this supposed to be?”
Vista 1 acrylic painting, 18 x 24 inches by Kathy Anderson, Granville, OH, USA |
Marsha, I just returned from Canyon de Chelly and have done two paintings so far from the experience. I love your interpretation of the colors of the canyon. The mystery is there too.