Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for Thinking in context…
No context – no story.
Correct point-of-view, both attitudinally AND physically, is all-important in both photography and painting.
Some of us artists like to deliberately throw things out of context to give what is actual, a bit of a twist. With me it’s usually colour.
From my point of view, my dog, Henri’ (named after Robert Henri) would chase a tennis ball 24/7. The cats could just about care less.
Thank you for the interesting letter. I never thought of that when doing my composition in painting. I think of perspective, forms, lines, colors and values. It is indeed a valuable aspect that may improve my work.
Thanks you so much for this information. So much can be lost if the desire for the proper colour or the overall picture. I read and save all your sage advise.
As a professional photographer I can’t tell you how important these thoughts are and how often many photographers forget about it. It’s not enough for the photographer to take in the scene and then do a close up. That tells little or nothing. Us ambulance chasers know about this. The idea to always remember is that if you get the burning car in the background, they will print it.
I take a minute or two at the beginning of every painting to have a period of meditation on the work I’m about to begin. The scene sometimes plays again before my eyes, and I see in my inner mind the values that make it work. Sometimes it means moving in for a closeup, but more often than not it means backing off.
Being quoted out of context and being misquoted are two different things.
No one but another artist could give this advice. (The six examples he mentions in his letter) I commend Robert for these insights. They are useful.
Context is fine and necessary … but it will sometimes lie to you. When I was in college art “truth” was the essential thing regardless what the image represented, but rather what it WAS. I have come to understand since then that the truth of an image can be so skewered as to confuse the viewer until the artist has lost any communication. I find that is the case more often with figures and people. One can paint a garden scene or still life and arrange the blossoms and no one cares … it is still a garden or a teapot, whatever, and however you choose to place the elements of your painting is positive to the composition. But an odd shadow, an awkward gesture, or even a feature so individual the viewer questions the validity of the figure … that is a problem of context. Example: I’m painting some Longhorn cattle at the moment. Any cattleman will study the painting and know that is exactly how Longhorns are built, especially bulls: heavy body, scant legs, testosterone laden muscle, and bony hips … but that’s the way they are. I have altered the cattle so they aren’t so disproportionate but it still bothers me. Do I paint context for cattlemen or a pleasing image for the casual viewer?
He who always plows a straight furrow is in a rut.
In Mycology (the study of mushrooms, etc) “context” is another word for the flesh–“the non-hymenial tissues that composes the mass of a fungal fruiting body.” Okay?
I have noticed the number of beautiful paintings on the Facebook En Plein Air page that are painted by Chinese artists. Wonderful, soft, landscapes particularly, that are so well done. Atmospheric city scapes, florals and misty rivers – wonderful art. Lots of other artists are included on their offerings but many are Chinese names. How wonderful that China is opening up to the western world and sharing their fine artists.
Art is the most wonderful illusion of all. It’s the last place where I would be looking for the truth.
Hi, Robert, I went there in 1986 and studied at The Central Institute of Fine Arts in Beijing. We lived in the school. I had signed up for western style figure drawing because I wanted to slow down and really learn about the human figure and I had heard they were the best in the world. That is true! We had given it up here but they had taken it over. However, when I arrived I was told that particular teacher was off on vacation and I could take folk art. I said no, I paid for drawing and I want that. After a round table conference where everyone had the chance to talk, they made up their minds. I did not get what i was told I would get but did get Chinese style painting, one on one with an interpreter, in ink and watercolor. It was a lot of fun and I loved it but have never pursued it after. I was tremendously impressed with their drawing and painting. Amazed, in fact. The museum we visited had some of the largest Chinese style brush painting in it I ever saw! The brushes must have been large as mops. The paintings were mural size. We were told they do them on the floor and use booties and walk across the paper. At the school we would see very small children with their drawings going into school. They were doing Geodesic Domes at age 5 or 6! I could hardly believe it. It was wonderful trip and I came away with a tremendous respect for the artists and the professor/artists. DCVeeder
The chinese paintings are a true treat. Especially if you enlarge them. You can see the sweat running down the bodies. I will say though the facial structures look a little more western than eastern.
Banana watercolour painting by Vicky Earle, Vancouver, BC, Canada |
Well said.