Archived Comments
Enjoy the past comments below for A great commercial conspiracy…
The reality from the outset is honesty of intent. Do you create your work for yourself or others? Who do listen to yourself or others? This spring Damien Hirst announced that all his work was rubbish, a result of advice and guidance from his galleries and others. After six months of seclusion he announced he was an accomplished painter and exhibited his racking labours at Londons Wallace Collection. Uniquely the critics slammed his efforts the assessment, overtly lightweight of little consequence. We may just possibly be returning to an era of intelligent enlightened criticism, long over due, an adjustment similarly akin to that of recent economic excesses. That even the Emperors New Clothes, have becoming too frayed. The sad fact is that there are many honest, exceptionally talented, dedicated, hard working practising artists who fail to be noticed in the same way as the Hirsts. It is because they do not fit into the precepts of sensationalism, shock, repetitious outputs, and art museums that stage funfair installations about experience. Seven Days In The Art World may assist in reversing the playground in which the mediocre media hungry artists inhabit, for this is the value the starting point they seem to hold dear. It is the easiest thing in the world to catch the attention of the media, the most challenging and exciting is to settle down and develop yourself, your sensibilities and insights, and honesty of intent.
I tried to read that book last year and couldn’t bring myself to finish it. It was too demoralizing. I’m a shy person of modest means who has to work 9-to-5. According to her book, the requirements for success in art seemed to be money and social adeptness or, if not born to be a socialite, then one needed a talent for B.S. mixed with balls. I don’t have any of these qualifications, so I’d rather not engage in a “sport” where I’m bound to lose by following “their” rules. It’s taken me a while to understand that I do need to engage in this system anyway. I can’t stay on the sidelines. I’m passionate and serious about my art. I’ve sold some pieces at open studios and I’m starting to develop a body of work. Soon I’ll need to wade into the gallery system, but I will try to do it with my own personality intact, with grace and humor and my usual attempt to see the humanity in all people I deal with (while still keeping an eye out for my own protection, of course). Not something that sounds like a fun game though!
The book sounds very intriguing and informative! Not to be a, well, “critic”, but there is no “Lido Canal” in Venice, and Biennale denizens do not speed around on vaporettoos (no one does – they are the public slow bus), but by “motoscafo” (private speed boat). Nevertheless, a book to read while scanning for “artistic license”!
Bah, Humbug !
I totally enjoyed this book. It was a quick insight to the high end Art world and as metaphor for the free enterprise life style expounded for the last century by its greatest purveyor the good old (and tired) US of A.
I am weary of “artists” who urinate in a tank, add a crucifix and call it art. When did installations of dung become art? I may paint “pretty pictures” but my clients love my work, and I get enormous satisfaction working in the representational realm. Not to say abstraction is not art – art evolves – we evolve. But the current art scene is disgusting.
Nancy, The Dung Madonna your referenced was taken out of context. It was heavily based on Ofili’s Nigerian heritage. Another issue at stake with that is the idea that “good art” is not supposed to shock. I for one can stand still lifes yet I can say whether or not something is technically good or bad BUT does that mean that the work itself is good? I could argue that any work of art that elicits an emotional response from the viewer is a successful work. That is typically the camp I reside in, good or bad if I love it or am utterly annoyed/disgusted by it I feel that the artist was successful. As far as the current state of art, I think as soon as concept became more important than craft, art suffered. When someone said that the social merits of work outweighed the actual construction and execution of a work it set the precedent that one could dodge craft and actual skill as long as they could argue their piece solidly. But most of that is IMHO :)
This would make a great movie, don’t you think?
Art packs the same kind of mystery and promise as the circus, organized religion and other, often misguided human endeavors. For this reason, outrageous expectations, including obscene prices may be achieved for slim efforts. Scoundrels abound, and there is a particular dollop of scoundrel in dealers, critics, collectors and the participating artists themselves.
I happen to know one of the characters in Seven Days in the Art World. Talk about take-no-prisoners- ambitious. Moreover, I grew up in the NYC art and fashion world of the ’50s and ’60s: an ego-soaked venue if there ever was one. It’s no surprise I opted to be a teacher and stay away from that.
I think it is needed, that dollop of scoundrel, as an artist. If you can’t sell yourself and convince others why they should purchase your work, then how can an artist expect others to know to purchase their work?! Sure we can have the debate about artists who sell work being “sell outs” and those who don’t are true artists but really, an artist who sells work is merely a financially successful artist, it doesn’t make them less of an artist than one who is not financially successful. Do I have scoundrel in me? Certainly I do, I have priced work in a show to take into account the people who would be attending just so I could move work out. I just see that as being a savvy marketer :)
Ah yes, Artforum, the magazine that focuses on the notion that b.s will always baffle brains.
There are many different art “worlds” available for the artist to partake. Each has their own language and rituals. If you are trying to be in the Chelsea NYC art world then Art Forum etc would be one way to learn the language and such of that particular art world. If you decide that you rather paint certain subjects in a certain style then perhaps a fine art magazine such as American Artist or Art of the West will help you to learn that particular language. An artist has to figure out and decide where to reside. As for Mr. Hirst -I say each to his own. Then again some may think him to be an updated “snake oil” salesman . One could also think that regarding purchasing such art that a fool and their money are soon parted. The reality is that each art world has its own set of values and criteria as what is considered art worthy of commentary and sales. You really cannot expect otherwise.
Too right D Marshall. It’s taken me many years to work this one out. Although I knew it in theory a long time ago, I had defined these different art worlds too narrowly – hadn’t realized that there are more of them than I previously thought and that an artist could be genuinely creative within some of them if you used your imagination. I had originally just defined them into only two categories – because that was what I had been taught – ‘shallow commercial’ and ‘real fine art ‘, the latter meaning contemporary ‘Sensation/Shock-of-the-New’ artwork. Neither of these I fitted into. It’s not even that I dislike or not understand the latter, because I was ‘artistically brought up’ in that arena, but after many long years internally battling for the right to express whatever is important to me, I now just do what I do and the work will have to take care of itself somehow. Having exhibited in the past, now I’m more hermit-like. In the UK, we don’t appear to have the same sort of opportunities as you do in the US for exhibiting and judgement and selling, but as you say, you need to choose the right world for you. I wonder where my world is…..? This goes for technical advice too – you need to be aware that the artist is working in THEIR world – so take their advice if you need it, but take that into consideration. I’ve made that mistake so often in my life.
love your fooling around paintings – great color and energy – and HAPPY ! playing with paint is so refreshing and mind clearing.
Thank you for your inspiring, pertinent and thought provoking “Painter’s Keys” – they are indeed just that!!! An excellent documentary covering this very subject was produced and directed by Pamela Tanner Boll and produced in association with the Wellesley Centers for Women and can be previewed on www.whodoesshethinksheis.net. It is well worth your perusal and passing on to your public. The presentation comes not only with the video but cards with comments that can be used in group discussions etc etc. Thanks again for being there and encouraging all of us to “keep on keeping on”!!!
In many ways the concept of art as contrasts with the art market is similar to the world of commerce in goods and manufacturing as contrasts with the speculation in stocks on exchanges. Money seems to be a necessary tool, but an abstraction of value, ergo the perversity of the market, when considered from a purely art-centric perspective. Two different horns of the same dilemma.
It looks like the picture with Zoe’s assistance became On the coast #3.
All the info I have ever been able to find about this film I saw years ago is listed below. It was funny and depressing. The two dealers are followed as they go about their daily meetings with artist and collectors. They even try to guide one of their artists as he paints! These are very high level galleries. They didn’t realize how they would appear in the film but I don’t think this is a case of nasty editing to make them look bad. I would love to see it again but I somehow got the impression that they sued. Do you know anything about it? 23. THE PASSIONATE EYE: This week on The Passionate Eye, “The Dealer,” 1997 winner for Best Documentary in France. The film probes the inner reality of the exceedingly closed world of the art market. It follows Pierre Nahon, a leading Paris art dealer, as he wheels and deals in the big money world of art. The film caused a stir when it was released, and prompted two lawsuits. That’s “The Dealer” on The Passionate Eye, Sunday night at 10:00 p.m. (EASTERN) on CBC Newsworld. ———- France 1996 71min Video Dir: Jean-Luc Leon Enter the rarefied world of Frances upper-class art addicts. The simple cast of title characters has one thing in common: a love for expensive art and the wherewithal to either make, sell, or buy it. The ever-roving camera records glimpses of Basquiats of dubious origin, to the authentic works of Van Gogh, Dado, Lichtenstein, Louis Cane, Combas and Kota. Obscenely wealthy art dealers Marianne & Pierre Nahon are a dynamic and dismissive wheeling dealing duo who can make or break an artists career in the flick of a chequebook. In an astonishingly candid scene, Pierre informs the metaphysical painter Dado that his art could use more work and inspiration. A captivating, breezy romp across an exhausting schedule of dinners, gallery openings and seriously expensive purchases. Courtesy of La Sept Arte. CT 28 July 7pm Panel: R Weinek, S Hundt, Lloyd Pollack
Your Coastal paintings are wonderful . . . Themes, Colors, Designs, Moods! More, more . . .
The Painter’s Keys has been an educational and entertaining fine art forum. However, your political views of American politicians and politics are distasteful and belong to another web site.
@Tim S Art has a long tradition of being critical of politics and politicians. In most ways one can argue that art through out history has been the initial spearpoint showing the masses political issues. Sadly this day and age that has been taken over by the tv and talking bobbleheads. But the best part, being that the site is his, he can postulate & post on any subject matter he wants! A heated adult debate has never hurt anyone who is willing to see another side but still maintain their viewpoint.
Addendum: American politics and politicians are a distasteful subject to start with. Having said that I suppose any conversation involving either would be inherently distasteful!
Oh my, I think I may have inadvertently helped to kill this conversation thread! Funny how art and politics despite being so well connected tends to rile people up.
It doesn’t matter how foolish the art is, if you can get in and get out the experience can be called a success. Often, getting out means just leaving it to an equally foolish museum for a big tax write-off. Like running across hot coals, it feels good when you get over them.
@Norman, Then it would all come down to gimmick then given the “get in and get out” concept. Not that I am opposed to a gimmick, sometimes they sell more art than actual talent.
It’s the principle of commerce. The stock market is a good example. Buy low, sell higher. Pass it on to another person who has further reason to believe in it. It’s called “The greater fool theory.”
So all of the belief in the quality of the mine/art has nothing to do with it. It’s the dexterity of the trader?
@Fred, I think it ought to be both, I am a firm believer that a successful piece has to have both concept and craft together. A piece that is solely concept with very little craft, it just is not for me and I feel fails as a piece overall. We should not suffer that work, it should be pointed out as examples of what not to do. Having said that, I think that the “traders” that have been pushing conceptual art with little regard to craft have done a great disservice by pushing work and artists that perhaps shouldn’t have been promoted at all.
I am delighted to find someone else who has read the book. You give an excellent summary. It really is an eye opener-raises all kinds of questions about what is art and how it is valued. Also a fascinating look at some of the personalities in the contemporary world of art.
Morning Calle Recreo oil painting by Donna Dickson |
Thank you! WINDS TAIL is absolutely GORGEOUS! You are a blessing to all of us!